Wednesday, September 26, 2012

The Guardian pushes a £2-a-month levy on broadband to save their our newspapers

"A small levy on UK broadband providers – no more than £2 a month on each subscriber's bill – could be distributed to news providers in proportion to their UK online readership. This would solve the financial problems of quality newspapers, whose readers are not disappearing, but simply migrating online." - 
David Leigh, The Guardian

Uh huh. And a  £2 levy could save the candlemakers from lightbulbs.

Businesses that are using outdated practices need to die in capitalism. You can't expect people to prop up your failed business because improving your business practices is hard. But even worse, you want to force this upon people.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/sep/23/broadband-levy-save-newspapers

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Gary Johnson Files Lawsuit Against Democrats and Republicans for Anticompetative Acts

Interesting move. I'll have to see where this goes.

https://www.facebook.com/JudgeJimGrayLPVP/posts/526500074031484
http://gj2012oh.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/gov-gary-johnsons-campaign-files-anti-trust-action-against-debates-commission/

Friday, September 21, 2012

Presidential Debate Questions

I can only hope that when Romney and Obama do finally debate, they'll be given questions half as good as these.


For President Obama:

Mr. President, on the day you were elected in 2008, the unemployment rate was 6.5%, the national debt was $10 trillion, and a gallon of gasoline cost about $2.07. Nearly four years later, the unemployment rate is above 8%, the national debt is $16 trillion, and gas is about $3.85 a gallon. The number of Americans on food stamps has grown to 47 million now from 30 million in November 2008. On what basis can you say to the voters that you deserve to be re-hired for another four years?

For Governor Romney:

You are airing campaign commercials promising that you will generate "59,000 new jobs for New Hampshire," "create over 200,000 new jobs for Colorado," "create over 700,000 new jobs for Florida," "create over 100,000 new jobs for Nevada," and "create over 340,000 new jobs for Virginia." Doesn’t this undermine your message that jobs are created by entrepreneurs not by Washington politicians? How can you possibly know with such fine-tuned certainty and specificity how many jobs you will create in each state?

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Woman Jailed Over Facebook Comment

Paula Asher, a woman from Kentucky, was apparently driving under the influence and hit another car. She wrote about it on facebook, saying "My dumb bass got a DUI and I hit a car…LOL".

The existence of such on outrageous comment offended the judge so much that Paula was told to delete her entire facebook account. Paula didn't take this order seriously, and the judge actually found her in contempt of court over this, jailing her for two days.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/09/lol-facebook-post-after-dui-accident-lands-woman-in-jail/

This girl sounds kinda stupid, but I'm amazed at the powertrip this judge is on. This is a very clearly an abridgment of free speech. And even if we were going to go over some kind of justification against "hate speech", this wouldn't qualify.

I'm more amazed at the comments defending the decision. WTF "americathepitiful", the first amendment is not there just to defend criticism of the government. It's there most importantly for that reason, but that doesn't make it the only defended speech.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

NDAA Reauthorized

Well.

That was fast.

The recent ruling that the NDAA is unconstitutional has been appealed by the White House, keeping it in action for the time being, until it is reviewed by higher authorities. This stay will last until at least September 28th.


Let's review what Obama said on December 31, 2011 when he signed the NDAA, shall we?

“The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it. In particular, I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists.” - Barack Obama

Where the hell is that reluctance now? Some people might have been able to defend Obama before by saying he didn't like this part and wished it wasn't there, why in the world would they fight specifically to keep that part?! Why aren't Democrats waking up to see this is the man they elected?

http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-lohier-ndaa-stay-414/

Obama Says Judge Ruling the NDAA Unconstitutional was an Unconstitutional Ruling

I mean, since when have judges been allowed to make rulings? They've gone mad with power in their attempts to stop others from going mad with power!

But those other people were only going mad with "serious reservations", of course.

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-administration-fights-for-the-ndaa-2012-9

Saturday, September 15, 2012

How to Secretly Rob a Nation

How does one rob an entire nation? There are quite a few ways, actually. Most under the name "taxation", but I want to look at one that is done secretly, where very few people even realize they're being robbed. I'm talking about printing and loaning fiat currency.

Say, that some nice property you got there.
It'd be a shame if something... happened to it.

First let me explain what I mean when I say taxation is theft though.

All taxation is theft and extortion by definition. If Fat Tony rolls around demanding "protection money" from the local laundromat, we call that out as extortion, and rightfully so. The laundromat owner had no choice about contracting the mafia to protect him. They simply threatened him into accepting their "services".

But how is this different from the actions of a government? You do not "sign up" to be governed. If you think you're government's charging too high a price, you can't switch over to another company. The government is nothing more than the biggest mafia in town, both pretending to have some kind of "rightful claim" to your money, when you really have no choice about it. The only real difference here is that the taxman might actually believe his claim.

Your money or your life!

All government taxes aren't quite so obvious though. If I want to find out how much money was robbed from me directly in a sales tax, for example, it's right there next to all the legitimate trades on the receipt. I think I'm right in saying that people aren't "shocked" to find out the government took their own cut of a deal that had nothing to do with them.

Other ways are a little more surprising. For example, the inflation of a fiat currency.


Now what is inflation? How does it work? The simple answer is, money is a good, and like any other good, it is subject to the law of supply and demand. With a high supply of something, it's price drops because it's more easily attainable. We value rare things more highly *because* they are rare. If we gained the abilities of King Midas and could turn things to gold with a simple touch, the price of gold would not be very high.

So when the supply of money rises, when it inflates, the value of money falls. It has less purchasing power. You can't buy as much with the same amount of money any more, because that money is less valuable. The supply of something rises and falls for many natural reasons, like the discovery of a new gold mine for example, so you'd expect inflation in any society with any currency. However, as total supply is really hard to upset naturally, the value of money normally stays pretty consistent.


However, the inflation of a fiat currency is *not* a natural reason. Have you ever heard the phrase "money doesn't grow on trees"? The phrase means that money is not something easily attainable, and is used to encourage someone to save and to be more thrifty. People need to act responsibly with their money, and not be wasteful.

Well, for the Federal Reserve, money does grow on trees. Better yet, they don't even need to wait on the trees to bear fruit, they can just print the money themselves. If these banks are ever strapped for cash, they can literally just print money for themselves. This is not earned money. This is the creation of money ex nihilo.


How does this work out as theft from you and me though? That new money is getting it's value by stealing it from your saved money. While the central bank and government now have a lot of new money, the money you have is worth less and less. It is *exactly* the same as a tax.

Luckily for the ones printing the money, they are the last ones to feel the effect of the inflation. After they've printed the money, they still hold basically the same purchasing power as they did before. People haven't figured out that the money supply has gone up yet, and haven't had time to readjust prices.There are absolutely no downsides to them for printing more money. They have everything to gain and nothing to lose.



And it doesn't just stop there. Then these bastards have the nerve to loan the new money out and charge interest on it! But hey, I can't condemn charging interest entirely. After all, people need to be compensated for the sacrifice of their money over so much time. They worked long and hard to earn it. That money represents the contribution they've made to society by producing things people wanted, and we're creating an opportunity cost of what else they could have done with this money they earned oh wait this money was never earned the central bank just printed that money out of nothing and didn't do any work themselves even in the past to earn it nor are they taking on any personal risk by departing from their money!

And still! Still! Even while they're earning interest, if you miss your payment they get to take away your stuff as collateral! They can take your property away from right under your feet, at no personal risk for themselves. Not to mention that when the Federal Reserve loans it's money to the government, they have to tax you to pay for it! They have the all the money they could ever want, and can just sit back and get all your stuff too.


And the best part is, the nation never even sees it happening. You never face the taxation directly. All you know is that the price of everything seems to be going up, the economies in the tank, when you hear this great news from the central bank that they're going to get everything under control with nice sounding systems like "quantitative easing". You're not sure what that means, but it sounds soothing and really smart, so it must work, and you trust them to make things right.

I don't think I could come up with a more brilliant scam if I tried.

Friday, September 14, 2012

NDAA's indefinite detention provision declared unconstitutional

In a bit of good news, the section of the National Defense Authorization Act that allowed the indefinite detention of US citizens without charge or trial was ruled as unconstitutional!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/us-totalitarianism-loses-major-battle-judge-permanently-blocks-ndaas-military-detention-provisi


Unsurprisingly, for a bill that Obama signed with "serious reservations", his administration seems to be fighting tooth and nail to keep this disgusting power.

http://www.businessinsider.com/unbelievable-obama-administration-has-already-appealed-ndaa-ruling-2012-9

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Economics: Lesson 1 - Cast Away

To understand economics, you must always always always look towards the individual. You must understand the tree before you can even hope to understand a forest. Likewise, if you don't understand the individual, you can't understand the vast complexity of commerce among a great number of individuals.


To best illustrate this, many economists use the classic example of Robinson Crusoe, the famous castaway. I haven't read Robinson Crusoe, so instead I'm going to use Tom Hanks in Cast Away.


Even stuck on an island in the middle of nowhere, people still act economically. They work to get food, water, and all the supplies they need. More complex ideas like property rights and trade are purposefully kept out of the picture so that we can just look at this one man, fighting against nature.


Before today, this island was entirely uninhabited. This island was not part of any economy. It had rocks and trees and coconuts on it. But now that there is a human on it, with the presence of an acting man, this island is (or at least soon will be) economized.

Stranded on this desert island, Tom Hanks takes action. Now, when we say this, we mean purposeful behavior. Tom Hanks, the individual, has goals that he wants completed. His world is unstable, and he believes he can improve it. He wants food. He wants shelter. He wants warmth.


To satisfy these wants, Tom will employee some means to achieve these ends. This is purposeful action, entirely distinct from unconscious twitches and basic reflexes. Tom will employee his mind, his reason, to figure out what these means are. The things which Tom uses as a means to fulfill his ends are called goods.

One of the first things Tom will need is a source of food and water. These goods will directly satisfy his desires of staying hydrated and staying nourished. By eating, he directly satisfies his hunger and by drinking he directly satisfies his thirst. Because these goods will directly satisfy his desires, we call these things consumer goods. Please note that consumer goods do not need to be literally consumed. The clothes he is wearing, for example, are consumer goods, since they are directly keeping him warm.



But strangely enough, Tom Hanks is unable to bite through the coconut. How ever will Tom Hanks ever solve this problem?

Now, he could keep gnawing on it until it breaks, but that's rather inefficient. If he is going to eat the coconut, he's going to need to figure out a way to open the coconut up. So he picks up a rock and starts hitting it. This rock has become something known as a producer good. This rock will not directly satisfy Tom Hanks hunger problem, but he hopes that by using it as a tool, he can obtain his desired consumer good more efficiently.



However, the rock is very dull, and doesn't break through the coconuts very easily. As time goes on, Tom will want to increase his income, or the rate at which he obtains goods, by boosting efficiency. If he spends time developing that rock into something new like a knife, he will have created a special type of a producer good known as a capital good.This producer good is distinct from the rock in that it is a man-made tool, as compared to just something that was lying around naturally. Nature has been developed upon.

This capital, by the way, is what we refer to in the name Capitalism.


To create a capital good, Tom had to restrict his consumption, also known as saving, and transfer his labor from producing immediately satisfying consumer goods to the production of the knife so that he may consume more in the future. This process of creating capital goods is known as an economic investment.

But the most valuable producer good that Tom has at any time is himself! When we use our own bodies to produce something, it is called labor.


This is in direct contrast to when Tom uses his body in the way he wants, like relaxing on the beach, swimming, or sleeping. In these cases, Tom's activity is known as leisure.

Now, Tom might enjoy working, but that does not stop it from being labor. If there was no end result in his mind, then he would not consider doing the job. For example, Tom might like climbing trees to collect coconuts, but if he already knew a certain tree didn't have coconuts, he wouldn't consider climbing it.

Instead, Tom would engage his time in play, a consumer good, which is any activity that is sought for it's own sake. This could, again, end up just be climbing trees, but the distinction is that he is not directly seeking a final product, but is just enjoying the activity.



So as you can see, even in our one man economy, many of our basic economic principles are still in place. We still have production, goods, capital, and income. Economics isn't just this big, complex working of society. As long as their is a man taking action, trying to fulfill his desires, economics is taking place.